This section hosts guidelines, manuals and toolkits to strengthen public health practice.
Zero COVID strategy better protects the health
The G10 countries are far more affected by the pandemic in all aspects than the OECD countries that have opted for the Zero COVID strategy or similar, a representative benchmark of 82 million inhabitants of economically advanced democracies.
The number of deaths per million inhabitants was 44 times higher in the G10 countries, which means 1.1 million too many deaths by June 30, 2021. Economic performance, civil liberties and mobility were also worse.
Zero COVID strategy benefits the economy and accelerates recoveries
In 2020, the countries applying the Zero COVID strategy had almost returned to normal economic activity. Their GDP was down only slightly (-1.6%) compared to 2019. Meanwhile, the decline in GDP was greater (-5%) in G10 countries that had not eradicated the virus.
Zero COVID is a cost-effective economic investment with lasting positive effects. In the second quarter of 2021, the GDP of the Zero COVID countries grew compared to the fourth quarter of 2019 (+1.7%). In the countries that did not eradicate the virus, GDP decline remained significant compared to the fourth quarter of 2019 (-1%).
Zero COVID strategy preserves freedoms more effectively
The Zero COVID strategy costs less in terms of civil liberties. An analysis of the data that make up the Stringency Index indicates a clear advantage for the Zero COVID countries over the other G10 countries in terms of freedom.
Conversely, the stop-and-go alternate in the G10 countries, a consequence of the virus mitigation strategy, leads to a periodic retrenchment of freedoms, reflecting measures to contain the pandemic. As long as the virus continues to spread, freedoms are going to be restricted. This entails a proliferation of moral problems, with isolation and a deterioration in the care of the elderly and of unprotected children exposed to the spread of the virus in schools, as well as tensions with people unwilling or unable to be vaccinated.
Zero COVID strategy preserves everyday mobility more effectively
Mobility data from Google show that “workplace” traffic in 2020 and 2021 fell by less in the countries applying the Zero COVID strategy (-10%). This was a much smaller decline than G10 countries applying a mitigation strategy (down 26%).
Google data show that traffic in “cafés, restaurants, hotels, non-food businesses and leisure and cultural activities in general” was down by 11% in 2020 and 2021. This was a much smaller decline than in the countries applying a mitigation strategy (down 22%).
Zero COVID strategy helps control uncertainty
Cross-referencing of quarterly economic and health data confirms the superiority of the elimination strategy in terms of anticipation. People in those countries benefit from a level of visibility enabling them to project their societies and economies into the future.
In contrast, the course taken by the G10 countries has produced fluctuations, with the epidemic rebounding periodically. The mitigation strategy is causing them to seesaw, making it difficult to The Zero COVID strategy continues to protect people, economies and freedoms more effectively project into the future and thereby penalizing societies and economies. This is especially problematic for businesses that depend on significant social interaction, like hotel, restaurant, culture, transport, and recreation sectors.
The contrast between islands confirms the superiority of Zero COVID. The contrast is especially stark between Commonwealth islands applying the Zero COVID strategy (Australia, New Zealand) or the mitigation strategy (United Kingdom).
To read the document, please click the link below.